BLOG

How to Choose the Correct O-1 Visa Classification (O-1A vs. O-1B)?

The O-1 visa is commonly discussed as a unified category, but it actually comprises three distinct classifications, each tailored to professionals demonstrating extraordinary achievements within specific fields. The O-1A classification serves individuals with extraordinary ability in the sciences, education, business, or athletics. The O-1B classification operates through two separate tracks: one designated for individuals with extraordinary ability in the arts, and another reserved for those with demonstrated extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry (MPTV).

At the outset of an O-1 petition, the most critical step is determining which subcategory aligns most accurately and advantageously with the applicant’s background. This choice is not merely procedural. The evidentiary standard for O-1A is significantly higher than for O-1B, and even within the O-1B umbrella, the requirements differ between the Arts and MPTV. When it fits the applicant’s profile, the O-1B in Arts category is often preferred due to its relatively flexible evidentiary standards.

But real-world careers don't always fit neatly into these legal frameworks. Many artists also hold teaching positions. Others work in creative roles that blend artistic, technological, and commercial skills, such as product designers, UX researchers, or media professionals in advertising or digital storytelling. And in contemporary art practice, it's increasingly common for individuals to work across disciplines and media.

These cross-disciplinary profiles raise a recurring problem in O-1 strategy: how to classify applicants whose work spans multiple professional domains. If USCIS determines that the selected category does not match the proposed work or the applicant's qualifications, it may issue a Request for Evidence or even deny the petition. This risk is particularly acute in cases where the engagement involves teaching or academic appointments.

A published AAO (Administrative Appeals Office) decision illustrates this issue clearly. The case involved a world-renowned violist who had been offered a three-year professorship at the Yale School of Music. The petition highlighted his extraordinary accomplishments as a performing artist: prestigious international awards, participation in globally recognized tours, and a track record of critical acclaim. Despite this, USCIS denied the petition. The reasoning was that the proposed employment was primarily educational, and that teaching does not qualify as an “entertainment event” under the O-1B in Arts classification. In other words, although the applicant had extraordinary artistic credentials, USCIS concluded that his role was that of an educator and should therefore have been filed under O-1A, which carries a much higher evidentiary burden.

The petitioner appealed. On review, the AAO disagreed with USCIS's initial reasoning. It clarified that the O-1B in Arts regulations do not actually require the petitioner to participate in entertainment events, and that a full academic year can constitute a qualifying “event” under O-1 standards. The case was remanded for reconsideration under the appropriate legal standard.

This case highlights the importance of how the engagement is framed. For artists who also teach, it is often strategically wise to position the role as an extension of their artistic practice rather than as a stand-alone educational post. Teaching, in such cases, can be presented as one way in which the artist continues to develop and share their work. For academic appointments that span multiple semesters or years, defining the start and end dates of the academic term can help clarify the project’s structure as a legitimate “event” under the visa rules.

Misclassification is one of the most common reasons otherwise strong petitions encounter problems. For applicants in hybrid roles, or those working at the intersection of art and education, art and business, or fashion and media, selecting the right O-1 category and framing the engagement with care is essential. Even within the O-1B classification, it’s important to specify whether the applicant is applying under the arts or under the motion picture/television track, as each has different expectations regarding the type of evidence required. Cases like the Yale violist’s show that USCIS doesn’t always get it right on the first pass. But they also show that how the petition is framed can make all the difference.

OTHER TOPICS